A new method of growing rice is now spreading in many rice-producing countries. It is called the System of Rice Intensification (SRI). The method was initially developed in Madagascar by a Jesuit agriculturist, Fr. Henri de Laulanie and continues to be refined by thousands of researchers and farmers all over the world.
In the Philippines, the promotion of SRI is being undertaken by SRI-Pilipinas, a consorium of NGOs which I coordinate. We have already conducted one-day trainings in at least 47 provinces in the Philippines. Now, we want to do trainings in every rice-producing municipality in the country. We need at least P25,000 (around $500) per municipality, and hope to gather donations from Filipinos abroad who may want to sponsor a training in their municipality. If you are interested in donating, please contact me privately (rverzola@gn.apc.org).
SRI involves a few simple but major changes in farmers’ methods. Not expensive, but challenging because it involves a major change in mindset.
- Farmers are used to transplanting 3-week old rice seedlings or older. Under SRI, 8- to 12-day old seedlings are transplanted.
- Farmers are used to flooding their fields. Under SRI, anything longer than a 3-day flooding is avoided. Wetting the soil, or intermittent flooding and drying, is instead encouraged.
- Farmers are used to planting distances of 15 cm or closer. Under SRI, planting distances start at 25 cm and may even be greater.
- Farmers are used to planting a bunch of seedlings per hill. Under SRI, one seedling per hill is encouraged. At most two is allowed.
- Farmers are used to chemical fertilizers. Under SRI, the use of organic matter is encouraged.
- Farmers are used to herbicides. Under SRI, a mechanical weeder is used instead, not only to control weeds but also to aerate the soil.
These simple changes in practices result in a very different kind (“phenotype” is the technical term) of rice plant. The plants produce much more tillers — 20 upwards, instead of the usual 5-10 tillers per plant. The tillers produce the grain, and the more tillers, the more grain, the greater the harvest. The loss of yield from wider spacing is more than offset by the bigger gain in yield from the greater number of tillers and the greater number of grains per tiller.
For details, please download this file: System of Rice Intensification: Practices and Results in the Philippines.
The benefits are many. The increase in yield, coupled with reduced cost, means greater income for the farmer. The health benefits should not be underestimated. Agricultural chemicals poison the soil, the food that comes from it, the drinking water and the surrounding fields. The environmental benefits are also considerable. Poisons are minimized and can be avoided altogether, giving common farm organisms (like mudfish, snails, crabs, frogs, etc.) a chance to return to the farm. Less flooding means less anaerobic decomposition of organic matter, which means less methane generation and therefore less greenhouse gases. Methane is actually worse than carbon dioxide in its greenhouse effect.
A mindset change among our farmers is bound to generate many positive consequences down the road. To accomplish this, we need a lot of support.
6 Comments
sir im interested with SRI, may i know if the recent certified seeds in the market can be used for this method?
thanks;
ness
SRI does not confine you to specific varieties. It works with most varieties, though some varieties may tend to respond better than others. We tell farmers to use their favorite varieties. Where is your farm?
Greetings,
Obet
Sir where can we find design for mechanical weeder?
The sri method is recently applyed in Iraq as a expirementl feilds (1)hictar to each .. I need imags & video to view new methods to this system ..
THANK & GREETINGS
What is the minimum quantity of organic fertilizer/compost that need to be applied using the SRI method?
It is hard to give a definite answer to this question. A lot depends on the soil type as well as its history of fertilization. and other factors.
But as a rough guide, our suggestion to farmers is to try to put back as much organic matter in the soil as has been taken away from the soil. Thus, a 5-ton harvest that will not be returned to the soil (assuming all other agricultural wastes are returned) means that ideally up to roughly 5 tons of organic material should be returned to the soil. If it is a 5-ton rice harvest and the rice husks are themselves returned to the soil, then roughly 2.5 tons of organic matter should be added to the soil to replace that which has been taken away. Clearly, a farm that sells most of its harvest for cash (instead of being consumed by the family) needs to return more organic matter to the soil.
Again, it is hard to quantify a minimum. I would suggest that a farmer be observant and if his/her crop seems anemic, it might be an indication that the soil needs more organic matter.
Also, by encouraging the growth of nitrogen-fixing and other beneficial bacteria, some of the replacement organic matter may in fact come from the air itself, or from the activity of bacteria and other microorganisms in the soil.